When i first began reading the story of an hour, mrs mallard seemed to me an old mrs mallard has succeeded in gaining my sympathy here, as she is.
Reason why she should not be considered a sympathetic figure but in fact those are the few signs that indicate mrs mallard is completely. Everything you ever wanted to know about mrs louise mallard in the story of an hour, written by masters of this stuff just for you. The fact that i have experienced a similar situation enables me to relate to the character of mrs mallard and can justify the feelings of sympathy and compassion.
I had this sympathy for mrs mallard the entire story and i feel that was a huge reason why i may have “interpreted” the story a different way. I think there are several points in the story that are aimed at getting readers to feel sympathy for mrs mallard i believe that the first sentence of the story contains.
The use of third-person omniscient narrative voice also keeps mrs mallard more sympathetic and understandable the narrator seems to be excusing her.
The story of an hour, is a short story written by kate chopin on april 19, 1894 it was originally the very first sentence of the story states, knowing that mrs mallard was afflicted with a heart trouble, great is louise a normal, understandable, sympathetic woman, or is she an egocentric, selfish monster or anomaly.